RE:RE:RE:T.RoweI don't think you get it. They have to report the new 0.14% of new shares they bought but THEY DON'T HAVE TO REPORT the HEDGE they likely took to cover the 0.14% on that "new" Fund along with the 0.15% they already owned in the bagholding fund.
So they own 0.29% of VRX long, and ___% of VRX short which they do not have to report!
But that answers your question, why would they be sueing a company they are invested it. Well... nobody shoots themselves in the foot do they? LOL