RE:Recent EventsHow do you manage facts, in this case metallurgy, that you believe is completely irrelevant to the success of your mine ? Or are you suggesting that management should have know that a group of dykheads would concoct a BS story with the sole purpose of trying to make a quick trading profit on it. How could any management group be expected to guard against BS like that. Christinaw wrote: Been a buyer from $1.01 up to $3.05 and I'm upset and disappointed, not neccessarily with the SP but with AZ management especially. Though the company disclosed the manganese levels 10 months ago, it neglected to consider that other experienced miners as well as smelter service execs could convincingly make a very differnent case based on management's disclosure. And they have. The shorts waited until the financing deal closed, then pounced.
Ethical? No, because someone or some group primed GMO. Who knows which information will end up being the right version of the facts and when. The point is I wouldn't have bought at $3.05 with the information I have now. I blame management because it failed to properly manage the facts. The stock price reflects investor concern.