Must Capital Inc V.MUST.H

Everything is In the Financials!!!!

[illumination1]

unfortunately, folks most companies operate the way this one does. There are companies that don't issue any warnings as to doing pp or anything of the like and even if they do they will already be doing them. This company is not operating any differently than the rest on the venture. Everything is clearly shown in the financials and yes things can be misleading but if anyone has any doubts it is shareholders responsibility to look at the financials which can be obtained at sedar.com this company hasn't done anything wrong/illegal or otherwise that any other company that is listed on the venture exchange does. Everything that Derek has said while referring to the financials is correct but as far calling this company a scam no--that is not. In any case, when you look at the financials you will know what you are dealing with. And yes, there are lots of class b shares about 54 million or so so when you take the class A and B shares there are about 68-70 million shares which when legally handled will definitely create more liquidity and movement of the equity and that in turn will most likely result in the s/p going up. In any case, yes, there is significant risk involved with this equity just as there are with many others out there. Bottom line have an investing strategy in place as to knowing your entry and exit points and follow it. Have a designated core and trading shares. I have designated about 5,000 shares as traders as I would like to hold all 100,000 shares if possible depending on the growth trajectory and financial health of this company which has clearly stated that it will be in a debt position for the foreseeable future. Everything really depends on the success of branding and creating mass consumption of the product and proving it sets the standards and yes there are tons of imaging softwares out there so lots of competition but that is with everything else. Some companies succeed others may not but that is after all the stock market and that doesn't make one company a scam and another not. I call a scam when management has no real interest in conducting a legitimate business which is not the case here--success or not doesn't mean something is a scam if there are legitimate steps to try to succeed in the market place while file all the necessary legal documents. On a personal note, I will convey this fact--as something I do is screenwriting. I can have a finished script and look for financial backers with every intent on making a feature length screenplay but I may say to them that I can't guarantee it will succeed I will do my very best to see that it does. In exchange I will give you production credit. Now if on the worst case scenario when trying to get talent and paying for it nothing gets made and I come back and say this happens that doesn't make me a scamer it just made me unsuccessful, but if on the other hand I tell people I am going to get this made and have no intention of doing so, take their money and disappear--that would make me a scammer. There are those who do things like this and those are the horror story that we hear but this company has product, has it distributed and has every intention to grow the business--let us not confuse success or the lack thereof as being a scam--some make it others may not--that's just business and investing in them. glta