Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Great Lakes Graphite Inc GLKIF

Great Lakes Graphite Inc is an industrial minerals company focused on bringing carbon properties and products. It focuses on the manufacture, marketing, and sales of graphite products. Its product is categorized in types: graphite and advanced carbon products. Some of its natural flake graphite products are Micronized, High purity micronized, Ultra-high purity micronized, Spherical purified, and Coated spherical purified. The advanced carbon products include ALD-Coated graphite, Graphene, and Carbon composite materials.


GREY:GLKIF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by BShunteron Jan 31, 2017 6:50pm
134 Views
Post# 25780456

RE:New presentation

RE:New presentationThe presentation on the GLK site has been changed since this morning to reflect the Matheson costs.  I am thinking that the presentation with the much higher costs was either a complete typo, or they may be working on the costs for some purification as that would be the next logical in their product development and that would be in sync with the rest of the presentation.  Someone made a comment about developing a mine would cost much more than the ~$5 MM and I would agree that is not enough to develop a mine.  So my opinion is that its most likely a typo with a small chance of it being some purifiying costs that were released prematurely.  Purely speculation on my behalf.
Bullboard Posts