@dart321. DON'T FEED INTO HIS BSso today you say it shouldn't have been at $1.95. Let's take a little timeline of your posts here....FEB 15 (@ $1.09) - "little birdy saying shorts are about to get fried..... FEB 10 (@1.14) - "a very good chance there will be no more looking back. I also think there could be a very good possibility we may see new highs" (what happened to $1.95 was too high and we should be in the middle)....... FEB 6 (@1.06) - "the stock spikes to $1.25/$1.35 and climbs from there quick. In my opinion that is what is likely going to happen." .....JAN 30 (@1.16) - "next 3 weeks will be massive" .... JAN 28 (@1.18) "soon we will most certainly see news highs and depending on how big it or they are we might see a market cap above 100 million" (ps. that would the price at approx $4).......okay we can skip a little to the highs..... DEC 7 (@ $1.80, high $1.95) "got a nice chunk of shorted paper...waiting for them to try it again" (wait.. didn't you say $1.95 was too high, why would you be buying at these levels?)... again DEC 7 "shorts are going to get creamed" ......... so on and so forth. look this guys history, it is so blatantly obvious he is a paid promoter it is pathetic. I could list countless other posts. Hopefully people look themselves and see through your BS.