RE:RE:RE:VotingI can only go from my own experience with splits. And they have all been negative. Granted, most were penny stocks and I know this situation/company is different.
We're all entitled to our own opinion, however, please refrain from posting inaccurate statistics unless you can back them up with facts. 99%?? I think what you meant to say was 99% of the splits are recommended if it can benefit management. I've been in the game way to long to know that there's no way splits will benefit the shareholder 99% of the time.
wittmann wrote: Although voting is the democratic thing to do,you guys do realise that %99 of the time the splits occur if it's in management's best recommendation?
We retail investors have zero to say about it...especially if big holders back the company.They usually do.
I pay more attention to posts such as retires...where he posted that insiders bought.It wasn't chicken feed either.
Those are important developments.