OTCPK:PILBF - Post by User
Comment by
seatleslimon Jun 20, 2017 12:55pm
126 Views
Post# 26383145
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Why terminate the deal now
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Why terminate the deal nowThe "longer game" assumes CEMEX needs the resource and has few practical alternatives at Pier 92 and Redwood City. I could be wrong, but I haven't heard a case that makes sense. Yes, patience required. Martineau, like most of the rest of the directors own less stock than they collect in annual directors fees. Honestly, don't think anyone is paying attention to his ideas, but agree at a sub $200M valuation USCR would be a competitor for these assets. I agree its a possibility and at some point far gone conclusion. Would be a disappointing outcome if priced on todays margins and volumes.