RE:RE:RE:Short Sellers forced to buy back stockOK man, at this point you're basically openly advocating for what amounts to a short and distort campaign and are literally half sentence away from saying as much. I find that a bit funny because you sort of started out by saying you didnt like when Cohodes flew the BS flag.
Which brings me to why shorters generally get such a bad wrap:
To say something is wrong with the business and to genuinly beleive that there's malpractice going on and want to expose it is one thing, but the goal here seems to be soley to bring the price down iregardless of whether the company is actualy a valid or invalid buisness. I say this based on them 1) timing their releases, 2) using extremely biased "analysis" and arguements and 3) virtually ignoring critique of their analysis. This sort of process is not a service to the market.
PROtrading wrote: Are you an idiot or just pretending to be? And don't come at me with your aliases 545buddy, I'm a PROdetective on that front ok? LOL
You obviously don't understand how the shorts work, do ya? Look at the numbers many of the short have already covered and aren't going to reshort until the charts tell them to. It's like waves crashing on a beach and you're the idiot tourist who wonder where the splash is coming from! LOL Do you know how litte waters sharks need? LOL
Watch and learn ok. You have Sulley here to help with the scream machine, AND "Number One" showed up. She's quiet but wait until she starts up! She's good, real good :-) LOL
JDavis17 wrote: Maybe Cohodes isn't as sure about his short as he makes believe? His last short-and-distort piece was a joke, and a bad joke at that. Accusing EIF of money-laundering? Seriously? Unreal.