Some posters would do well to stop attempting to trivialize the seriousness of today's PR. At the heart of the matter is the fact that the science did not work to prevent cancer recurrence. I'm not talking about striking down potentially deadly visible tumors but destroying for good the less demanding microscopic cancer cells. The last couple of days I've been using the analogy that you need to prove you can make it across the length of the pool before telling everyone you can swim the English Channel in record time. It would appear they didn't even make it to the end of the pool. Some are putting their faith for a comeback on the possibility the results were skewered by cancer cells migrating from another part of the body. Could be but why then did the PR use the vague term possibility and not probability? It still doesn't account for the fact that the researchers were well aware of the history of all 4 patients and proceeded with the treatment anyway. One could conclude that the experts didn't find cancer cell migration a worrisome enough issue. IMO, RW should not have bowed to pressure to release such early data. Maybe he had no choice but the results for the sp and perception of the science speak for themselves. What next? Pick up the pieces, re-finance the company at the best PP price he can squeeze out the capital markets and carry on at the sp valuation the market see's fit.