Mission Ready Solutions Inc V.MRS.H

RE:RE:RE:RE:high heat gear HHG glove liner

[TheRevenant2016]

The focus is or should be on Mission Ready Services 2.0 MRS 1.0 doesen't matter- and what 2.0 have developed with the US Dept of Defense as co collaborators....fully funded and bringing thru the commercialization process...what is currently in their Rand D que that will eventually be commercializedf...and what TECH they have aquired thru the route of aquistion...(No Contact LLC). Nothing matters at this point cept the go4wd strategy and rollout of their entire best of breed high tech disruptive product line and within that category nothing else really matters
at this point as in RIGHT NOW...is the company coming thru and announcing the PO
for their first belt line production run to ship product as per their $400Million USD 5yr term (all numbers minimums) dist agreement.

That we are holding steadfast barely 10% off historic highs or at least 52 week highs despite the fact that the company did not meet its YE 2017 Guidance to announce the PO?

Is a definite plus. For if we double from here its into the .75 cent ranges that new money changes hands and after that it changes hands again at $1.50 when latter stage investors will come in once again...each time doubling in value with a subsquent distribution and consolidation along the way at each higher trading...the normal and healthy pattern for any ascending valuations for a company in a secular strong uptrend.

I as a long however caution...that I do not believe this company will survive the negative onslaught that will occur if it does not announce the PO and announce it soon...or if the
Dist Deal falls apart and does not come to frution and just like when the aquisition of WTG
did not close but was offset by the humungous upside nature of the Sept 6th Dist Deal
announcement that more than offset the disappointment the WTG deal not closing after
they had said it had closed on more than one occasson prior...and were waiting around for some
other orderr of mangitude to develop...cuz think about this for a minute.

The company never said on Sept 6th where the large foreign military order is...or who the distirbutor was/is and remains so lets say its Egypt...and it falls part and it was for $400Million USD vs comes together. But non one knows it was for Egypt for example. So no announcement
time goes by...you communicate your just waiting for the other party to get their ducks in a row but your ready to roll and announce when they are you have the PO and are going into production...but in the meantime? no one knows your original deal that culminated in the Sept 6th NR fell apart cuz you never named parties involved...so you know you have some other countries who are classiifed as foreign in nature...so you buy time by not committing anything to the deal that caused you to announce Sept 6th...while working on another country or countries to announce as the foreign military order destination...and who would be the wiser when you didn't name the country of designation in your original Dist Agreement NR 5mths prior? or going on 5mths.

Maybe you back fill it with a 5yr committement to Ukraine vs Egypt....they committed to mentioning that they have something going on with Canada and the Ukraine and Tunisia...but did anybody ask themselves why is it then that we can mention Canada and the Ukraine and Tunisia (who have recieved initial product for evalaution purposes) but we don't and did not mention who the end point was in the Sept 6th NR for a massive...simply massive $400Million USD 5yr single source foreign military whereby the distributor involved will recieve exclusive rights to sell and market and distribute in that region of the world?

It should strike some as odd...cuz it has me and has since the Sept 6th NR came out.

Who wouild not want their country named? or the distributor involved named if we can in a conference call just throw out..."we have something in the que/development with the UkraIne and Canada...I mean we don't have anything with those two countries as of yet but we were able to just throw those two destination points out there by naming the exact countries of expressed MRS productline interset BEFORE we even enter into anything with them.

So then...why the stealth mode in play with an actual $400million USD sales number involved 
with an actual country destination vs in the que like CANADA AND THE UKRAINE WHICH WE HAVE NO TRUOBLE MENTIONING BY NAME AT ALL?


It's a legi question...cuz I mean asking myself it for some time.

So lets just get the friggin PO issue from the Sept 6th 2017 NR out of the 
way...announce the country of origin who want the MRS Flex9Amor
and who the distributor is...i cannot see why confidentiality for them would
be in play but not for naming Canada and the Ukraine or Tunisa?

Makes no sense. And move on. To the $1.00 levels and beyond on the valuations
and to other things in the que for MRS 2.0 operationally.

"The PO is coming...By YE...not coming by YE stay the course...were waiting...not where we expected it to be but were very happy"?

Is getting to long in the tooth. and we have so much more than Flex9ARmor in the companys commercialization shute but that first PO validates the $400MILLION USD dist deal.

And before to long...? IMO the company giving out excuses as to why its not yet
closed and in receipt of the PO? will start raising a lot more questions then 
answers that will sufice inquriing investors IMO...including me...if its not done soon.

StacksEdwards wrote: This stuff is so old. 2014, in some cases. What they have going on today is all that matters. 
 

gutfelt wrote: MRS grasping at straws here in my opinion I dont see this as anything worth their while