GB Group Ord Shs GBGPF

GB Group plc is a United Kingdom-based company, which provides identity data intelligence products and services helping organizations recognize and verify all elements of an individual's identity at key interactions in their business processes. The Company's segments include location, identity and fraud. The location segment includes address lookup, verification and capture; e-mail validation; phone verification, and data maintenance services. The identity segment includes document verification, data verification and identity investigation services. Its identity verification solutions can be configured to carry out a wide range of functions, including know your customer checks, anti-money laundering checks, age verification checks and liveness detection. The fraud segment includes transaction fraud monitoring, combating origination fraud and in-life fraud investigation services. It provides artificial intelligence powered screening for automatic onboarding or referral of customers.

OTCPK:GBGPF - Post by User

GB Group Ord Shs > Mar 9 - Notice of Change now on Sedar

<< Previous

Bullboard Posts

Next >>

Comment by silkroad007on Mar 10, 2018 12:03am

83 Views

Post# 27695941

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Mar 9 - Notice of Change now on Sedar

Have to agree with SB here and it seems fairly straight forward of you don’t over think as it seems most do here. If the cash threshold has not been reached then the cash did not run out period. If the cash did not run out then it must have been maxed out per share at $43. Whether you assume it’s the full 140MM or even 102MM as some assume based on shares tendered ratio.

IMO the only way the 140MM isn’t spoken for already is she got he fact it wasn’t maxed out. Now I highly doubt the second round of rendering allows you to select cash options. Otherwise why have several rounds.. basically the rest who didn’t tender will chooses to daybttafe CMED until the end in which the will be forced to convert to ACB automatically.. this is exactly why they have terms called mandatory uptake.

If it was all the same and you could tender, un tender and choose cash up until the end we would only need one uptake..

Sbeavenx wrote: I am referring to a full $43 per share if seleted "all" cash..

The argument to this is that there is an excess of $4M (98 vs 102). The excess 4M would have been allocated to all shareholders that requested beyond the $5.70 if required, but since it was not, then all selections must be have been fully funded with the 98M. So if you selected cash, or partial cash, then you should receive the full amount requested.

Hope this makes sense.

longonMJ wrote:
Oh, I am in total agreement with you that it's definitely mathematically possible for each share to receive $5.70 if that is what you meant by full cash per share.

From your previous posts, I thought you was referring to the entire $43 per share as being "full cash". From my point of view, I see your now started $5.70 full cash paid out portion to be what I would call a proration of my full cash paid out portion of $43 per share.

I guess it's really nothing more than different definitions by the two of us as to what the term "full cash per share" really means. For you, it's $5.70 per share while for me, it's $43 per share.