Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Graphite One Inc V.GPH

Alternate Symbol(s):  GPHOF

Graphite One Inc. is a Canada-based company, which is focused on developing its Graphite One Project. The Graphite One Project is envisioned as a vertically integrated enterprise to mine, process, and manufacture anode materials for the electric vehicle lithium-ion battery market. The Company’s Graphite Creek Property is situated on the Seward Peninsula about 60 kilometers north of Nome, Alaska. Natural and artificial graphite anode active materials and other value-added graphite products would be manufactured from the concentrate and other materials at the Company's proposed advanced graphite materials manufacturing facility located in northeastern Ohio. The Graphite Creek Property consists of 135 State of Alaska mining claims (State Claims) and 41 state selected claims (SS Claims). Graphite One (Alaska) Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, holds the property and is developing the Project in Alaska.


TSXV:GPH - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Abruzz0on Mar 12, 2018 6:42am
158 Views
Post# 27699106

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Mine

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Mine The question then becomes: will Graphite One actually go down the CSG road? Should it try?

Personally I do not think such verticalization is warranted. It will be a major transition for an exploration company. Why go so far, dilute heavily to get there, and then have to spread thinly the expanded gain?


Bullboard Posts