Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Enbridge Income Fund Holdings Inc. EBGUF

Energy Oil & Gas Midstream
"Enbridge Income Fund Holdings Inc is engaged in the generation, transportation and storage of energy through its green power generation facilities, liquids transportation and storage facilities."


GREY:EBGUF - Post by User

Enbridge Income Fund Holdings Inc. > Growth without dropdowns?
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(72)
•••
Comment by TickerTwiton Aug 10, 2018 3:19pm
129 Views
Post# 28442348

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Growth without dropdowns?

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Growth without dropdowns?What I've often seen in mining companies with a few institutions dominating the common shares is that (on entry) they establish a right to buy enough of each share offering that their % of voting control isn't diluted. I don't see why ENB and ENF couldn't work something out if ENF votes to become a standalone. I suppose it comes down to ENB's assessment of how efficient the cost of capital is.
.
autofocus111 wrote: ... say ENF was to propose buying a $1B stake in the now Canada-owned TransMountain Pipeline  project, and issues shares and maybe debt to raise the neccesary funds. I don't see why ENB would object to that. My point here being that there should still be the possibility of growth for ENF without ENB dropdowns. Or am I missing something?


<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities