RE:RE:RE:RE:I hope Jarvis sells Shoal Point ASAPSo that means you, as a SHP shareholder, are fine with having a CEO that spends almost no time on the company you are invested in?
As a shareholder in a company there is nothing strange about voicing your concerns if and when they arise. In fact it is expected, since your equity stake lets you actively participate in company decisions at the AGM.
For me as a Giga owner, SHP is not a big problem right now since Mark's #1 priority is clearly Giga, but once the permitting stage is reached the SHP holding could look bad and should be divested. I also believe this could be a positive thing for SHP shareholders who deserve management with 100% focus on the company.
The part that does bother me more is if money that was raised for Giga Metals is instead used to pay bills or salaries in SHP. But don't worry, I will contact the company directly with these questions, I just wanted to see how many others on this forum that had the same concerns.