Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Nutritional High International Inc. Ordinary Shares C.NHL


Primary Symbol: SPLID

High Fusion Inc is engaged in the manufacturing, processing, and distribution of infused edible products. The company's operating and geographical segments include Palo Verde; Pasa Verde; Oregon; Colorado; Nevada and Washington. It generates maximum revenue from the Palo Verde segment.


OTCPK:SPLID - Post by User

Comment by Tundra14on Mar 27, 2019 12:35pm
119 Views
Post# 29543049

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Financials

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:FinancialsHaha, cover, cover, cover.  Are you two related?

For everyone’s sake, here’s hoping the both of you and a few others, will be pumping the sh!t and jumping up and down with joy posting here when the results are out.


LiquidOctopus wrote: He's actually quite consistent.  This is seperate from his analysis on the scenarios (the best post anyone has ever done here).  Here he's just defining a personal satifaction threshold.  He's never once said he'd be upset.  His minimum is repeatable results.

Now here I am discussing the board and not the stoc

I too am wondering what we're going to be looking at for this quarter.  Because most the revenue increase we see in this set of financials should be from organic growth in California from products and distribution.  As opposed to the major new sources of revenue we should be seeing later this year from aquisitions and new operations.  If it is a significant increase, it will be a significant indicator on the company's performance in California.   If it just demonstrates consistency and repeatability, that's not bad but growth could be big deal.  

Tundra14 wrote: What happened to those rose colour glasses you’ve been looking through?  Possible reality setting in and now covering yourself for past comments and predictions?


Greede wrote:

I set my bar low - i'll be really, really pleased if they can merely REPEAT or come close to $5.8m once again.  

If they get growth beyond that? Wonderful.  Pure gravy in my books.  

We know that this sector has valuations that are TOO high and stocks like this (generating the kind of rev we are) that are valued too low.  

Somewhere, the t'wain shall meet.

 

oggyswain wrote: I think everyone is. I just emailed EAT. Hopefully, they answer my questions this time.
 

 

HHturdferguson wrote: I'm getting some crazy anxiety waiting for the next release. If the numbers are good there might be some GT news as well. Correct me if I'm wrong, I think EAT needs to pay GT 2M plus 4.6M in the next 12 month minus the 150k for land. 

 

 

 




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>