RE:St-Georges - opinionWango and phob.. i see both sides of ur discussions.. both have points with merit. However.. we can not deny the simple fact of lack of transparency in providing shareholders information on plans or explaining delays is the reason why the glass looks more half empty than half full... something is up beyond just waiting for extraction mastery...i really want to know who at icm makes the strategic decisions? Richard ceo title could just be him signing off in things proposed to him... simcoe and sx seem to have control over icm direction.. Icm copy amd paste news releases from sx is not a sign of a ceo providing direction to shareholders.. something is off no doubt.. what was the strategic reasoning for launching ceo verified ? Makes no sense.. if icm does nt have intel to promote to drive sp up why start paying georgy.. seems like a buddy club to get georgy shares and promote keturah to get her shares... all im saying an argument can be made both ways however arrows are mostly pointing to something changed along the way beyond waiting fro extraction results