RE:RE:Worst Pot Stock on the TSX LOL is all i have to say M4.
they'll put profits second to their "reputation"
Interesting perspective when $FIRE is selling all their product at a prime rate of 7$ a gram and arent paying any patient retention fees.
How much have they already wasted on Lesotho to be "fair"? What return have investors got from this "investment"? That's right, ZERO.
Laughable once again, Lesotho is for international initiatives the sector is very young. How has Lesotho been for canopy or aphria or anyone else?
things take time... and you obviously dont have the patience for this type of value investment.
What i may suggest is hop on Twitter and follow the pumpers you will get the volatility you are looking for.
M4DM4X wrote: Let's get some things straight, Supreme: - The produce a good product, and refuse to produce average. - They care about fair play. - They care about educating the public and social issues surrounding weed. We could say that this is one of the "good guys" in the MJ sector, and therefore could be considered a "good company". Unfortunately, the above reasons make Supreme unattractive to investors: - The produce a good product, and refuse to produce average - In other words, they'll put profits second to their "reputation" and "artistic integrity", as has already been demonstrated. - They care about fair play
- Once again, profits come second because of some sense of morals. No one plays fair in the business world. How much have they already wasted on Lesotho to be "fair"? What return have investors got from this "investment"? That's right, ZERO. - They care about educating the public and social issues surrounding weed. - Apparently they haven't heard "get woke go broke" - Investors don't care about social justice. Supreme isn't a messiah sent to ensure everyone is educated on weed, just make a product and try and sell it. Once again, this illustrates that Supreme puts profits second to their personal/emotional endeavors This is why this stock does so bad, this is why this is a garbage investment. I actually like the company and product, but they offer nothing to an investor - Too many variables, too much emotion in their decisions, too much ego. It's VERY obvious that Fowler puts his ego, his desire for fame, and his emotional decisions before the company or it's shareholders, who would want to invest in that?
BirchBrook wrote: 3 years ago I bought this at 1.70 and now it's heading back to 1 - 1.20. Get out now before it drops below a 1 $