Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Hudson's Bay Co. HBAYF

Hudson's Bay Co, or HBC, is a Canadian retail business group. The company operates department stores throughout Canada, Belgium, Germany, and the United States under various banners. These banners include Saks Fifth Avenue, Hudson's Bay, Lord & Taylor, and Off 5th in North America and Galeria Kaufhof, Galeria Inno, and Sportarena in Europe. HBC also has investments in real estate joint ventures. In Canada, it has partnered with RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust in the RioCan-HBC joint venture.


OTCPK:HBAYF - Post by User

Comment by Bookendson Dec 02, 2019 5:22pm
63 Views
Post# 30414924

RE:RE:Got to wonder...

RE:RE:Got to wonder... I'm thinking they would have talked to both beforehand to try and get a sense of if they would support 11$ and if they wanted to participate to their bid.

However, then it does seem like there won't be tons left for Baker to capitalize on himself.

For sure the best possible outcome, for us, would be for Baker to meet Catalyst's price. But the cheepest option for Baker would be to cooperate with Catalyst at 11$.

If Baker was to up his bid, I don't see how the special commitee's opinion to Catalyst's 11$ would be relavant... But I guess they are stuck between a rock and a hard place. If would be hard for them to objectively justify how a 11$ offer would be inferior to a 10.3$ offer... With an ongoing OSC investigation, I suppose they have to be very careful at how they approach this, regardless of how Baker is pushing them to act.   
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>