Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Acreage Holdings ACRGF

Acreage Holdings Inc is a vertically integrated, multi-state operator in the cannabis industry. Its business operations include cultivating, processing, distributing and retailing cannabis. The Company derives its revenues from its retail dispensary business where cannabis and cannabis-infused products are sold to consumers. Its geographic segments include New England, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, West and South.


OTCQX:ACRGF - Post by User

Comment by Homestretch4meon Jan 15, 2020 4:30pm
120 Views
Post# 30557418

RE:Link of interest

RE:Link of interestYou are correct when you say the value of the deal changes with the price of the shares of canopy. You are also right to say that for every acreage share you own you will receive 0.5 818 shares of canopy. The share exchange ratio is the important number. Currently for the same amount of money you could buy acreage shares instead of canopy shares and end up with three times as many canopy shares than if you would have purchased canopy shares originally. I have a large position in canopy but I have an even larger position in acreage.
geodcan wrote: https://highgreennews.com/article/cannabis-marketing-south-africa-emerging-industry

where we got a mention about almost having a Superbowl ad.
As far as the deal that I mentioned before which seems to be lost to most investors, especially newer investors, it is still inked and according to the previous poster doesn't shake out as I mentioned in a previous post.  He seems to think that the value has dropped to 1 billion, which is still significant, and not the 3.5 billion that I mentioned from my due diligence.
It depends how you do the math I guess.  When sharevalue drops the numbers come up less but it is the ratio of Acreage shares to Canopy that I expect to stay the same which is the same deal.  If the shares of both companies hit the set value date again then the 3.5 billion value would apply again.
Don't lose sight of the significance of the deal.  Canopy is going to trade shares of Canopy for Acreage shares, when Canopy feels secure against the Feds.  Canopy needs what Acreage brings to the table and interestingly enough, despite what Constellation said about Linton, both Canopy and Acreage are still picking up pieces with full intentions of being the world leader.  
There have been concerns about Constellation that they did a bad deal but they are a money making machine that saw their future and moved to protect their interest with their $5 billion investment in Canopy and the inked deal with Acreage.
The exuberance drove the shareprice of potpreneurs past the point of rational and I sense that we are at the point of a serious separation of winners and losers.  I also sense that Constellation/Canopy and Acreage are going to be in the winners circle when the greenrush is triggered in the US.  Progressive companies like C C and A are already moving towards the future, legally, in States that allow cannabinoids as the rules are written.  That is what winners do.  It will be a bloodbath for the reactives!  glta and dyodd



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>