RE:RE:The stock policefedor604 wrote: https://equity.guru/2020/04/07/cannabis-beverages-last-hell/
Even Chris Parry is bashing them, Sproutly once paid him to write articles now he is bashing them........... There's alot of people out for Sproutly now.
One reason there has been so much pressure, Lot of people are getting fed up with what Sproutly Dolo/Sen is doing here.
They have news and are withholding it, Sproutly before the Moosehead deal told the CSE we have big news comming in a month or so ... This is a proven fact that Sproulty witholds information from shareholders. They have done this with mulitple releases.
Dolo telling people there license is comming then it not even come is a joke to boot. And telling people other things about the company is a joke. I think he has lost alot of reputation.
I work for a decent sized cannabis company in Vancouver and no one has ever heard of Sproutly... Either dolo is silent for a reason or this APP tech is a shame.
But if the tech can make it to markets it'll be good if not this company will go down hard.
The recent options @ .10 cents to a uknown are screamming he just screwed holders over and has no care in the world.
Scary move by Dolo and yet no one cares but the one hawk/james/jj/how many accounts the one guy has.... but why don't others care?????????
The comming weeks/month will make or break this company. Either way this company will be brought down, only spectacular news can save it.
Thanks for the post Fedor. Where to start. Hmm enjoyed the past articles he had on $PR.
https://equity.guru/2018/06/22/sproutly-cannabis-monster-making-youve-never-heard/
This new article most certainly has a theme and motive. Calling out the companies failures to deliver cannabis bevs for one. I enjoyed the frankness of his article and I agree these companies have failed to deliver thus far which may have caused irreparable financial damages.
With that said there are many reasons for the delay of Bev/edible products. The main and common reasons stem from overly stringent and down right stifling HC regs from branding, packaging to delayed Licensing.
At the end of the day, as does Hawk, Parry has his own agenda. Parry is paid to write these articles. Although I agree with his comments on the frustrating roll out or lack there of, of these bevs, he lost me on the closing paragraph.
Yes $PR along with other companies have disappointed many of their investors. I believe much of that is courtesy of HC. However, you can only blame HC for so much. $PR management need to communicate with share holders. There is no excuse for the silence.
I am not a cheerleader, $PR is not without fault and needs to drastically release something soon. If not bevs, some great news or as Parry said, “down we go”. I do not believe the flower sales will keep $PR afloat.
However frank Parry puts it, it is clear at the end of his article that he has no loyalty to any company other than his client. To say that Tinley is a clear winner in the Canadian cannabis beverage sector is a real joke and flushed his credibility down the toilet. Tinley has so much stacked against them. To even put something to market let alone the crappy tech they want to use is rediculouse to fathom Tinley as a contender.
I agree $PR is working against the clock and there next Q financials may be frightful should they not get moving, but I surely won’t be trading my position with $PR for one with Tinley!