RE:RE:RE:Edibles & Law EnforcementJuiceLee wrote: SUMKNDV1DERFL wrote: OddFellow1 wrote: I'm not worried about co-packers...now that the collar has been taken off Sproutly and the commercialization of infuse20 has begun.... beverage, baked good companies, health and wellness CO's that want into the cannabis market... with water soluble cannabis... now can! Those companies will do what ever it takes to get a bottling/packaging plant established and fully licensed to sell their Infused (with Infus2.0)products.
Where does keeping the public safe sit in all of this...?
You can bet the farm that Law enforcement will gravitate towards Infuse20 as the ingredient of choice for the new edible market...water soluble... a breathalyzer could easily be formatted to test for cannabinoids in your system. The current method is unreliable and inaccurate.
If this is to be the future of imbibing... all the necessary ducks need to be in a row in order for the gates to fully be open...
With Dr Sens Developed Analystics to go along with all of this....
Wayer soluble Cannabis... A way to gauge the level of consumption in ones system and a purity analyzer....
How much are shares?
i love cannabis- this is awesome
Speaking with experience in Intoxilyzers/Alco Tests, Drager was leading the race with saliva swab testing.
I do not believe law enforcement will sway government to have HC impose APP as the sole infusion tech based on a method for law enforcement to test/detect levels of sobriety.
There is no doubt in my mind that APP provides a more accurate and reliable test subject. Swabbing at road side may produce a 0 despite having consumed well over the limit of Nano THC/Oil. However, sobriety at the “time” of the event is the question. Obviously Infuz20 would be the “safer party choice” providing a clear judgment of the level of impairment and perhaps lead to a wise and educated decision not to drive. Rather than having an oil based product kick in while behind the wheel believing you were fine when you started to drive. It’s a winner IMO, but I don’t see it as a big enough testing win for enforcement to influence influence HC/government into an imposed implementation of Infuz20 only THC products. Would be nice!
I would have to say that the offset and time it takes for Infuz20 to pass through the body and no longer be detected is a real plus. For those that do not want to prove positive on a THC test would appreciate a water soluble product over a nano oil product as it will dissipate much more quickly from the body. This could have many professionals interested from athletes to 9-5ers.
https://www.draeger.com/en-us_ca/Alcohol-And-Drug-Detection/Drug-Test-5000
This "myth" comes from a Facebook account in the Sproutly group last year that he had a conversation with me Sen over the phone and Sen basically said and I am paraphrasing. "there is anecdotal evidence that shows this is true". The guy must of talked about this on Facebook for months .... and no matter how many times you sent him the Webster's Dictionary definition of anecdotal, he spread this rumor like wildfire. Just because your body processes it differently does not mean it would store it differently. Unless you have an article on APP that states otherwise? I would love to read it. Good to see your alive Sum....
Thanks J,
I am not quoting anyone on FB nor do I have any eveidence to prove my opinion. Just my theory.
Oil based products are stored in the body for X period of time. That is factual and easily located if you want the factual evidence. I was making the connecting assumption to that of Infuz20 vs Nano oil emulsification/encapsulation. Based solely on the time of onset/offset there is evidence that oil based products get stored with lipids and water based simply does not. Water based products are secreted rather than stored resulting in quicker dissipation from the body.
IDK of any time differentiation studies between the two for comparisons. However, I would bet money on Infuz20 passing through the body and being undetected more quickly than Nano oil. Just saying that if I were concerned about this, which although I am not, I am certain there is an audience this appeals to, I would perhaps choose the water based product. Just another edge APP “may” have to offer if we could ever get that far!