Fresh Tracks Therapeutics Inc V.BBI

RE:RE:RE:Rude

[RuudinFrance]

Eyeknewit wrote: Putz as i said..read the post again..info is as hard to get as it is for you to look at your portfolio loser, even on site..

Hi, Initwit,

now that we know each other better, we can get into the second phase of our relationship.
Don't get over enthusiastic yet, kissing comes later (if you're up to it, that is).
As you can see in how you're imprinted in my mind (Initwit), shorter is better.
When we analyse your last message to my precious self, we may conclude that here too, shorter would have been better.

I quote you: "Putz as i said..read the post again..info is as hard to get as it is for you to look at your portfolio loser, even on site.."

1 "Putz":
I suppose you wanted to write "Ruud" and conclude that reading/writing don't correlate well in your head. Sorry about that. Some people suffer from this kind of mental affliction, which may not be possible to cure. We'll be considerate in future communications.
As "Putz" is not shorter than "Ruud" and requires more different keys to hit, I'm confused to what goes on in your pretty little head.

2 "read the post again":
Let's have a sequential look at what was written earlier:
You: "ur just another putz who can read"
Myself: "I can read ;-)"
You: "read the post again"
Conclusion: You state that I can read, which is confirmed by myself and then you imply that I can't read! How silly can one be? It really is inconsistent.

3: "info is (as) hard to get":
As you knew before that I can read, you should have understood that I got the message. It really was unnecessary to show that you have such a low appreciation of the capabilities of others that you think that telling things more often makes them better understood.

4: ".... as it is for you to look at your portfolio ..."
I don't think that you know much about my portfolio. On that presumption I conclude that you write something about myself that is untrue and as it is not something positive, it must be a case of defamation/slander/libel.
Ooops, this relation looks like going nowhere.

5: "loser"
well, just another way of writing "Ruud", we've been over this before. I feel sorry for you that "The Great Pumpkin (TGP) in the Sky" found it necessary to put this affliction on you.
Look at it as if TGP puts you to the test, you'll have to beat it in order to get to the "Sky".
Success.

Conclusion:
Your message was way too long. "info is hard to get" would have been sufficient and I might have looked into that further. 
You've proven again that shorter is better.
Stay away from firearms in order to further protect your feet.

Have fun.

P.S.: Were not going to communicate on a "tit for tat" basis. Whenever you write something that is especially offending/untrue/stupid, I'll let you know, don't worry.

P.P.S.: Message to self: "What a waste of time!".