RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:6 Pending issuesAgain you are assuming too much. This is not brp. This is a company with 10 billion debt. You are not selling toys worth few thousand dollars to the hundreds of thousands. You are selling very expensive airplanes to very very small group of people. You are the one suggesting the family takes this private. Only an idiot will think of taking a company private. So let me get this straight, you want the family to go private at 80 cents while sp is at 40 cents. Yeah right so the family should borrow more to take a company private which already has a massive debt. Let me know if you can convince any investors to back the family up with providing financing to a company like bombardier. If that option was available to the family they would have gone private already and kept the rail. For all the other cr@p you wrote well thats just cr@p like you.
pablo87 wrote: Since they have done it before with BRP - very successfully I might add - it would make complete sense for a shareholder to think that it could happen, and for them to consider it. Why wouldnt they? Moreover, if you had studied the balance sheet and the in/out cashflow, you would know that they are entering a period where cash is coming in both from the sale of BT and also from BA in the normal course, plus they have just raised $1B. The pro-forma post BT balance sheet looks pretty good to me, an extra $1B of debt from a leveraged buyout would be easily manageable. In fact, what is more important is the rate of interest. If on a private basis they can borrow even $6B at 3%, they are much better off than $4B at 8%. I understand why you ad hominem though because you have no sense of the company so thats your only tool for one thing but more important, you want to control the conversation, you want posters to stay in their lane and subscribe to the narrative you try to propagandize. Which of course a long term shareholder with no connection to the family or management would be foolish to do given the past failure to execute.
Also you would know that to take a company private you need a lot more than 51%.
Bullvsbear99 wrote: What nonsense. Why not now when sp is half of that at 40 cents. Oh wait maybe they don't want to. After all why should the family with 15% ownership controlling 51% of company spent more money.
pablo87 wrote: Maybe the family takes it private for 80 cents? we'd have to accept it and move on.