Nemaska Lithium Inc NMKEF

RE:RE:Special Shareholders Meeting

[dalesio_98]

dalesio_98 wrote:

dalesio_98 wrote:
RAN is progressing on the Special Shareholders Meeting (SSM) front. Judge Gouin is aware of our written request to convene a SSM.

UPDATE

For your information, I corresponded with McCarthy Tetrault (MCT) over the weekend, MCT will suspend our special shareholder meeting request on Tuesday. We await the motion, Me Lozeau will defend our right to hold the special meeting.

I provided MCT the file sharing link to access the 1650 proxies totaling 87 million shares in my response.

I believe MCT will provide the motion at the last possible minute to destabilize us / curtail our defense.

I wish us success.

McCarthy Ttrault (MCT) did not reject our written request to hold a Special Shareholders Meeting (SSM) due to being under the CCAA.

MCT did not reject our written request to hold a special shareholder meeting.

MCT alluded to our request not being conform, I provided additional details on Saturday along with the link to access shareholder proxies.

Why is Nemaska legal counsel attempting to suspend our SSM?? 

Judge Gouin was only made aware of our SSM request Friday morning Oct. 2, 2020 at the end of the court hearing by MCT at approximately 9:50. Judge Gouin sounded surprised. Keep in mind our first written submission to Nemaska board was sent on September 16, 2020.

I took the initiative and e-mailed the written SSM request to Judge Gouin's office on September 27, 2020 for information purposes and to be on the record.

Is it a coincidence MCT is attempting to suspend our SSM request the same day Judge Gouin is made aware of the SSM? 

Should our written request for an SSM be upheld, October 7, 2020 we can initiate the process to convene the meeting.

The written request by shareholders to hold a SSM is a fundamental right under the Canada Business Corporations Act.

Will Justice be rendered or is Justice truly blind?