Bombardier Inc. T.BBD.A

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:spirit deal

[Bullvsbear99]

Article said white tail and you agreed with the article so that's why I am asking you for white tail info.

pablo87 wrote: stockit, you are completely wrong. I'm at peace with my investment in BBD. Of course there's downside like anything but its not going BK. There is a chance of getting back to $4-5.  More likely $1-2. and Go private also possible, as low as 60 cents to $1.  This is called scenario planning, you should try that sometime (read a book called the logic of failure by some german guy). I accept these 3 scenarios (60 cents to $1, $1-2, $4-5) and am holding on to my shares. Have a great rest of your day!

stockitnow wrote: Pablo87 you accused me of being Pierre. So dont play this attack game victim. Pierrelebel admitted not owning any shares but always posting negative news only. He would twist facts to make it negative. The volume of shares traded is low and Pierrelebel isn't posting anymore. He was a shorter and you were eating up everything he was saying from his hand. You claim to be long but clearly you dont remember anything. There are a lot of longs in here like myself. Long term company will get out of this. Its still very risky investment/gamble. You claim to be long and have said company is moving in right direction but make an about face everytime the wind changes. Longs invest and wait for long time. My bombardier holding is down 6 figures but you dont see me complaining. This is a gamble. I had bought at 2 held and not sell when it was 5.5 and still holding. Had i known bombardier conditions i would have sold at 5 and bought back now again. You claim to do research but still dont get it. Martel wont make any difference. Just like Bellemare he will take orders from the family. Long term family will want to increase the stock value as they own 15% of a shares. They are not going private as they dont need to put any more money in it to control the company. Family has 51% control. Why they spent money when they dont have to. Company is also not going bankrupt as family will do whatever to maintain control. Company was doing well but c series is what got us the big debt and down fall started from there when other division were under funded to control expense. It will be a long recovery period. Longs are patient you arr not.

pablo87 wrote: Stockitnow, fair enough.  I won't take it to heart though. You and others used to attack another poster pierrelebel non stop instead of the company so what does that tell you?  So while I take comfort in the fact that getting attacked means I'm doing my job as a dissenting shareholder, a muckraker so to speak, I take no pleasure in it as I have substantial losses on my investment in Bombardier. The date January 16, 2020 will live in infamy for me (only insofar as Bombardier is concerned) and despite my opinion that Martel will be a much better CEO than Bellemare) - albeit with a smaller pile of dirt to shovel - as all rational investors know, the root cause of the dismal performance of the company this past 7 years, the controlling shareholder, remains.

stockitnow wrote: Pablo87 everyone is entitled to their opinion not just you. But the vibe i get from your post is that you think your opinions are untouchable and you present it like facts. If you can't take it then dont dish it out.