Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

OrganiGram Holdings Inc T.OGI

Alternate Symbol(s):  OGI

Organigram Holdings Inc. operates through its subsidiaries. The Company’s major wholly owned subsidiaries include Organigram Inc., 10870277 Canada Inc., The Edibles and Infusions Corporation (EIC), and Laurentian Organic Inc. (Laurentian). Organigram Inc. is a licensed producer (LP) of cannabis, cannabis-derived products and cannabis infused edibles in Canada. It is focused on producing cannabis for patients and adult recreational consumers, as well as developing international business partnerships. It has also developed and owns a portfolio of legal adult-use recreational cannabis brands, including Edison, Holy Mountain, Big Bag O’ Buds, SHRED, SHRED’ems, Monjour, Laurentian, Tremblant Cannabis and Trailblazer. It operates facilities in Moncton, New Brunswick and Lac-Superieur, Quebec, with a dedicated edibles manufacturing facility in Winnipeg, Manitoba. 10870277 Canada Inc. is a special purpose holding company for the Company. EIC is a cannabis processor of confectionary goods.


TSX:OGI - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by MisterGRPon Nov 06, 2020 9:29am
347 Views
Post# 31850544

Supreme Court won't hear Organigram tainted marijuana class

Supreme Court won't hear Organigram tainted marijuana class

 

Supreme Court won't hear Organigram tainted marijuana class action case

The Supreme Court of Canada has declined to hear an appeal of a Nova Scotia court decision that reduced the scope of a class action lawsuit against Organigram Inc. over medical marijuana tainted with pesticides.

The case stemmed from allegations that marijuana grown and sold by the Moncton-based company contained pesticides not approved for use that made its users sick.

The class-action lawsuit was filed after two large recalls in late 2016 and early 2017 of medical cannabis produced between Feb. 1 and Dec. 16, 2016 after testing found "trace" amounts of bifenazate, malathion and myclobutanil. 

The pesticides are authorized for agricultural use but not for cannabis.

The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal ruled in April that the plaintiff failed to present enough evidence that the cannabis caused illness. As a result, members of the class can't claim damages for health effects. "

Dawn Rae Downton of Halifax is the representative plaintiff in the case represented by lawyer Ray Wagner. 

Downton said she experienced nausea, dizziness and headaches, symptoms that subsided after she stopped consuming Organigram's cannabis.

They sought to appeal the Nova Scotia decision at the country's highest court. The Supreme Court selects only a small number of appeals to The court announced Thursday morning it won't hear the Organigram case. That upholds the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal decision.

As is standard, it didn't say why it declined to hear the case. 

"She's obviously very disappointed, but thankful that we did our best to do what we could to try to bring this to the light of day and to compensate people for the harm that's been caused to them," Wagner said in an interview Thursday about his client. 

The Nova Scotia court had ruled that there wasn't a workable methodology to determine that the proposed adverse health-effects claims have a common cause. 

What remains in the case relates to reimbursement of payments to customers who purchased cannabis in 2016. 

Bullboard Posts