GREY:MGXMF - Post by User
Post by
Wangotango67on Nov 25, 2020 12:56pm
734 Views
Post# 31970569
FEW MORE QUESTIONS...
FEW MORE QUESTIONS...
Has mgx tested driftwood for a potential lithium bond to - silica + magnesium ?
( ref - ioneer ores )
MGX's driftwood resource calculation - i noticed the LIO acronym
LIO = is usually refered to - Lithium Oxide
Was this a simple error meaning to address the -( LOI ) Life Of Ignition - for the ores ?
Or... is there lithium with in the - driftwood ores ?
Some juniors provide an entire breakdown of ores...
Each mineral with in - with a sum value that represents - 100%
Ioneer speaks of a magnesium silica lithium bonded - ore.
Perhaps mgx should reanalyze their dristwood ores.
What remains of mgx's 133,000 hectars of AB oilbrines ?
Where and what exact formations ?
Are the 133,000 hectars in same formation as - E3 ?
What about potential salt beds ?
Suppose MGX's - 355,000 hectars were in E3's possession and Arkansas with Standard.
And... MGX shareholders are left with Driftwood....
What value would be geared towards this 4 million tonnes if mgx never updated the PEA / PFS
inwhich to address the value based on - magnesium alloy - vs - simple burnt oxide ores....?
I'm hoping the 355,000 hectars are with E3
And, the Arkansas is with Standard.
And... hoping Petrolithium Corp has a connection.
But...i have reservations...
I would like to know with - precision - how did these two other juniors acquire their lands.
especially when mgx was also promoting these same oilbrine formations or magnolia deal - how can this be ?
Answers to these questions - in this post and former post.
Would make this shareholder happy.