RE:RE:RE:Theories on one torch release, especially about pricingI don't know MTG. Why are sooo many posters hammering those posters that have independent reasonable thoughts that are not all about cheerleading? You know you would be hammered if you put up a thoughtful piece that is not what the masses want to hear. Even the CEO gave you a piece of his mind on Agoracom I believe. Anyhow, we are both landing on the same spot that we are expecting PYR to start selling many, many more of these torches, not just to big guys but to even the little guys. That is the target, that is the expectation, that is the suggestion, including by the CEO, but not a promise.
MidtownGuy wrote: Could be, could not be. Fun to debate nonetheless.
Speculation and discussion is the purpose of a forum about investments and where they are headed. Why be on a forum to disparage a forum? Why even have a forum?
There's volumes of possibilities about pricing and decisions. I can offer mine, you can offer yours, all good!
canyousayiii wrote: Or simply that is the price that the client negotiated for one torch. They want only one torch right now to see installation and performance in real life. It is not more complicated than that. Everyone that will be interested in torches will see that, and if the price is much higher, it is Peter, not SH that will explain to the potential client and the potential client will make its own decision whether they will buy it or not. If it is a client using just one torch for something, and a small business, if the cost does not justify the benefit, they will simply not buy it. This is simple business, but you can make out of it much more than that at a risk of completely missing the mark....NEEDLESSLY. Let Peter do his job and sell or lease or whatever it is that he can do to bring in cash to the company and announce when he is successful.