RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:ALL the burners Bleached, I love your theory.!
If Elon can use H2 to fly SpaceX to the ISS, then why not a furnace.!
Sweeden seems to have enough Hydro-electric ressources close to the project.
When that is not the case , generating hydrogen at a low cost will be a blast!
bleached wrote: Company A maybe putting the pressure on?
https://www.ssab.com/company/sustainability/sustainable-operations/hybrit
"
SSAB will cut its CO2 emissions in Sweden by 25% by as early as 2025, through the conversion of the blast furnaces in Oxelsund, Sweden, to an electric arc furnace." Research paper on plasma pelletization with LKAB (partner with SSAB on HYBRIT technology):
https://odr.chalmers.se/bitstream/20.500.12380/256741/1/256741.pdf
See page 19. Pyrogenesis mentioned.
See page 20 diagram. Look familiar?
See PYR Patent images: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9752206B2/en
HYBRIT: Client A, B, C?
https://www.hybritdevelopment.com/
Enter HPQ/Appolon:
On demand production of Hydrogen to burn to make electricity to run the arc furnace (plasma torches) by HPQ/Appolon hydrogen reactors.
Just a theory!
Stubbyinsider wrote: Peter said yesterday that it is actually PYR that is slowing the pace; A, B C are wanting it done faster. Either way, its great for the long term!
Winston123 wrote: Company A will continue to do things the way they always have. Steady, precise and calculated. That's how they became a billion dollar company. Like Peter says. Just getting in the door with one of these companies is monumental