RE:RE:RE:Looks like optimism is sliding downwards... Not to split hairs as you are correct, Quarky, it is about semantics. But here are the two quotes from the December 7, 2020 that everyone should probably be reminded of.
"Testing is expected to start before year end, but because of potential delays due to the holidays, may extend into January."
"The Company expects to submit data to both regulatory agencies in early 2021."
For good reason this second quote represents a vague timeline. Science can be an "imperfect" endeavour and to set absolute timelines would be disingenuous and dangerous. If one considers the rampant cries for a NR, my post this morning not withstanding, can we imagine would this board would be like if we had passed those dates.
So far the NR from December is right on target, even if that's a little broad for some.
They haven't reported because EVERYONE knows, including Rob Fia, the next NR is monumental in significance. Thrm is long past "feel good, NRs.
quarky2020 wrote: That's why 3 of my 4 options allow for a news release in the next few days, you ding dong. A lot of people have been saying "imminent" for more than a week now, and based on their previous NR, testing itself is PROBABLY finished (as they said testing MAY extend into January). My definition of "imminent" would definitely not extend past maybe next Monday, but then again a number of people all over the world think that somebody's return is "imminent", and they've thought so for over two millenia, so I guess definitions are pretty flexible.
End of next Monday and no NR or other new information? I'll probably have to adjust my position.