RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:CEO selling No, and I am not going to look into it to see if the stock went down because of that or whether investors' move to sell the stock based on that was sound or not. Sometimes selling is a bad sign, sometimes it is simply because a CEO wishes to raise some cash for whatever reason, most of the time none of our business. The system provides for some transparency, and it is up to investors to use this information anywhichway they wish to. If some investors are convinced that any sale by a CEO is a bad sign and the stock will tank, then they have the warning, and they have a chance to sell. I personally don't care about a sale of such a small portion of his holding. I happen to think he owns too much because it limits the other stakeholder's ability to influence a company direction, while many fans here put it out there as a great thing. Agree to disagree, before I get bashed by the cheerleading crew again for sound opinions. I think Agora question was about some update on the timing of torches, since there was no shyness in giving some timing projections in the past. I was not tickled by the answer. Agree to disagree, before I get bashed by the cheerleading crew again for sound opinions. ;-)
fdfd12 wrote: Have you seen the stock REAL.
CEO selling there and it has dropped like a rock because of it
canyousayiii wrote: So move on. Done. If this stock will be adversely affected by the CEO selling a small part of his holdings, then one should consider it even a riskier investment than it is. And note that he filed the intention to sell starting Jan 21st. He could sell all that day, or he could spread it out over time....his call but it is a reasonable assumption that he will try to do it in a way to maximize his return.