Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Great Pacific Gold Corp FSXLF


Primary Symbol: V.GPAC

Great Pacific Gold Corp. operates a portfolio of high-grade gold projects in Papua New Guinea (PNG) and Australia. In PNG, it holds a significant 2,513 sq. km mineral exploration land package. It includes early-stage and advanced-stage exploration targets with high-grade epithermal vein and porphyry-style mineralization present. Its Arau Project consists of two exploration licenses, located in the Kainantu region, and includes the Mt. Victor Prospect, hosting copper and gold mineralization. Its Wild Dog Project consists of one granted exploration license, EL 2761, and one exploration license application, ELA 2516, located on the island of New Britain and about 50 km southwest of Rabaul and Kokopo, PNG. Its Kesar Creek Project consists of one exploration license, EL 2711, and is contiguous with the K92 Mining Inc. tenements. Its The Tinga Valley Property consists of one exploration license, EL2720, located in the Papua Mobile Belt, which is host to several Tier 1 copper and gold mines.


TSXV:GPAC - Post by User

Comment by savinfamilyon Feb 04, 2021 8:02pm
84 Views
Post# 32480171

RE:RE:TMX Group Listing Requirements - Tier 1 vs Tier 2

RE:RE:TMX Group Listing Requirements - Tier 1 vs Tier 2
@savinfamily IMHO, my conclusion: $LVX is not yet on TSXV Tier 1 level because it hasn't yet a "work program with an initial phase of no less than $500,000 as recommended in a Geological Report"
 
0
 
@savinfamily Moreover, $LVX adjusted its shares restriction because it must have at least "200 Public Shareholders each holding a Board Lot and having no Resale Restrictions on their shares"
 
0
 
@savinfamily If all spin-out participants (as $FSX shareholders) have resale restrictions, the $LVX IPO participants (25-26 mil. shares) haven't resale restrictions.
 
0
 
@savinfamily But are there 200 $LVX IPO particpants ?? Maybe not.
 
0
 
@DasFinanzNockerl very well done summary!!!
 
0
 
@savinfamily About 13 mil $ from less than 200 $LVX IPO. That's very great, my friend. Deeply positive.Highly heartening.
For the sake of correctness and recognition to this board, that's the short copy/paste, very usefull IMHO, about Leviathan GOLD:

@savinfamily IMHO, my conclusion: $LVX is not yet on TSXV Tier 1 level because it hasn't yet a "work program with an initial phase of no less than $500,000 as recommended in a Geological Report"
 
0
 
@savinfamily Moreover, $LVX adjusted its shares restriction because it must have at least "200 Public Shareholders each holding a Board Lot and having no Resale Restrictions on their shares"
 
0
 
@savinfamily If all spin-out participants (as $FSX shareholders) have resale restrictions, the $LVX IPO participants (25-26 mil. shares) haven't resale restrictions.
 
0
 
@savinfamily But are there 200 $LVX IPO particpants ?? Maybe not.
 
0
 
@DasFinanzNockerl very well done summary!!!
 
0
 
@savinfamily About 13 mil $ from less than 200 $LVX IPO. That's very great, my friend. Deeply positive.Highly heartening.
@DasFinanzNockerl Do you really think if less people invest more in one project it works better ;-)
 
0
 
@DasFinanzNockerl I am so happy about that...
 
0
 
@DasFinanzNockerl that was a "tennis ball" question to keep you going ...
 
0
 
@savinfamily Yes, I think. In fact, they invest in @bslusarchuk and Co. That's the exploration game. It's not production (with mine life and AISC etc.) and not development (with measured, indicated and/ or inferred resources). The assets for now are the people and maybe the jurisdiction. Maybe the water balance too.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>