Blizzy420Thank you Blizzy420 for the measured and honest response.
Let me help with some good thoughts. If any person outside of law enforcement called a substantial governement agency a fraudster and it was not true, the agency would seek an immediate court order to cease and desist and take immediate action.
To just hightlight into a deeper dive, my Feb 26 email was a very harsh set of accusations, agreed?
Her reply on March 1st, did not deny any of those accusation at all. Think about that.
She said in principal 1) call the Police 2) Let me know if you have any ideas to improve our system and 3) you sent a letter of Dec. 23 and I replied on Jan. 2nd and quashed them.
The big issue is the huge allegations I made were not on my Dec. 23 letter, so even if you agree with her that she quashed them on Jan. 2nd, she openly did not deny any of the SERIOUS fraud allegations we made on Feb. 26. She did not deny them one iota.
And when I issued the email on Feb. 26 to all the key members of Congress, she did not reply to the email list on March 1st, she only replied to her own FOMB list and one Republican staffer.
My email went to everyone and our last 3 letters and emails since yesterday went to everyone.
She is in a corner and this has attracted all the players in Congress that want the 593 built and to end the corruption.
Do I wish I can publicize all the hard eveidence here? Yes. but you cannot as that evidence has people's names on them including the parties at hand. Stockhouse is not the forum for evidenciary presentation, nor do shareholders get to benefit from the "inside" moves to win our GRB battle.
But again, think about her non-denial on March 1st of my Feb. 26 email that I posted here.
She did not deny that at all. She deflected to a non-related Dec. 23 letter that did not make those harsh allegations.