Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Reconnaissance Energy (Africa) Ltd V.RECO

Alternate Symbol(s):  RECAF | V.RECO.WT | RCNWF

Reconnaissance Energy Africa Ltd. is a Canada-based oil and gas company. The Company is engaged in the exploration of the Damara Fold Belt and Kavango Rift Basin in the Kalahari Desert of northeastern Namibia and northwestern Botswana. The Company holds interest in a petroleum exploration license no. 0073 (PEL 73) in northeast Namibia and an interest in petroleum exploration rights in northwest Botswana over the Kavango Sedimentary Basin. The Company's exploration license covers an area of approximately 25,341.33 square kilometers (km2) (6.3 million acres) of oil and/or gas exploration properties comprising Blocks 1719, 1720, 1721, 1819, 1820 and 1821 situated in the Kavango Basin of northeast Namibia (the Namibia Licensed Property) and approximately 7,592 km2 (1.88 million acres) in Botswana (the Botswana Licensed Property). The two licenses together comprise over 32,933 km2 (8 million acres).


TSXV:RECO - Post by User

Comment by TurnToTheRighton Mar 06, 2021 12:35am
354 Views
Post# 32735351

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Went to the Horses mouth

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Went to the Horses mouth2 problems with your statement:
1. Alleged, not proven, therefore did not occur for all intents and purposes
2. Jay was accused of having a conflict of interest, not a bribery charge.
Please READ and use some LOGIC. What moron reads your article and gets that Jay was indicted for bribery. It says in plain english an alleged conflict of interest.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>