Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

BBTV Holdings 7 Unsecured Convertible Debentures T.BBTV.DB

BBTV Holdings Inc is a media and technology company. It provides end-to-end management, distribution, and monetization of content. The company's revenue is generated from direct Ad sales, advertising, content management, and mobile gaming apps. Geographically, the group derives revenue from Canada and India, of which prime revenue is generated from Canada.


TSX:BBTV.DB - Post by User

Post by Lazaroson Mar 11, 2021 2:03pm
257 Views
Post# 32774336

The problem with using Gross Revenue

The problem with using Gross Revenue

My main beef with this company is their "revenue" figure.  To make it look like they're a huge organization, they quote gross revenue as their top-line revenue figure ($150m Q4). 

This is highly inaccurate and a source of investor concern. The "gross revenue" was never theirs to begin with.  92.5% of that revenue belongs to the content creators and should never show up on BBTV's books.  They should quote their Gross Margin (what I call net revenue) as their revenue figure, because that is the actual revenue they are entitled to. They would never see the $150m to begin with. Their actual revenue was closer to $4m for Q4.

By quoting $450m in revenue, a normal investor would say "Why the heck are you losing money on that much revenue?".  In reality, if they used their actual revenue of ~$40m, their actuall results looks less troubling.  The CEO really wants to feel she is running a tech unicorn, but the reality says otherwise. This is a $40m revenue company.
 

[rant over]

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>