RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Sigilon
I never said you know very little. You refered to your 30 years of investing as some qualification to tell us that reverse splits are bad. I indicated that it taught you very little about reverse splits. Not whether you know very little. Come on, really? In your post it is quite obvious that you don't agree with a reverse split for SVA. And obviously there is no respectfully disagreeing in your world. Too bad because I have got respect for your opinion. And I will indeed listen to others who may or may not agree with me. I have been reaching out to this board for anyone here to give me a justifiable reason why a consolidation of shares would be negative for this company and all I get is completely unrelated references to other companies. Again, maybe you think it's macho to hold 200k shares instead of 20k. I don't know.
So rixpix, I hurt your feelings (which was not the intent at all). My intent, again, was to have a good business discussion about this and not get a personal reaction that misrepresents my or any other person's character.
Seems some of this board is comprised of politicians in that when directly confronted with a question they totally ignore the question and got to something else or even avoid answering at all.
I challenged biotech to answer this very question after he suggested it would be disasterous and so far "crickets".
I can understand and even agree that there can be negative short term effects from a R/S. But if this company is successful that is what it would be..short term.
Again, my position is I think eventually a consolidation of shares for this company would able for them to be uplisted and gain more exposure from major investment firms, who many by the way cannot invest in minor exchange listed stocks.