RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:SigilonLots of assumptions here Reddy but I fully expect this from you.
My main points you've purposely missed to spread your rose tint rhetoric. I am fully aware what an NDA is but my point is that they should have negotiated the use of the pharma NAME upon signing. I'm not suggesting that they should fill investors in on every last detail of the deal.
Secondly, Phil's presentation abilities is a personal matter, so you may like it, I happen to think it is weak. That doesn't make you or I correct. Also, I'm not suggesting we just get any ol joker up on stage and ramble away not knowing the science as you insinuate. You are very black and white in your rebuttals and try to downplay any concern anyone has. The main point was that Phil shouldn't be wasting time on these presentations which have very little viewership and very little impact on the stock when any presenter could do on his behalf. These are catered to retail investors. I bet you could count the number of attendees on this call on your hands.
He is paid far too much to be doing these presentations all the time when he could be working on getting hemo/thyroid into clinicals.
What is your rebuttal to the lack of info regarding those 2 indications? Are you satisfied with "we are working on getting hemo/thyroid" into the clinc" for the last 2 years?
Blows me away that you think everthing is being done perfectly and there is zero room for improvement. There is nothing wrong with criticizing a company you are invested in Red. Tired of your patronizing posts.
If WK is the mother-in-law who is always right, Red is the stepford wife. Pretending everything is just A OK meanwhile fully knowing the husband is out banging the neighbour and the teenage daughter blows her tennis coach.
Please give a thumbs up and click the subscribe button beow if you'd like more posts like these.