StageZero Life Sciences Ltd T.SZLS

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Hmmm... Echelon buying WTs, Institutions holding or buying..

[gojotv!]

More fanciful scenarios from cactus... Face it, dude...
Your talk doesn't match reality. Don't even try. 

cactuseskimo wrote: So you've been going around here day in and day out pumping the heck out of this company, constantly trolling all the guys who sold at profits, all because you have roughly a $1000 or so invested in this company? That's a lot of dedication on the dollar man. You know what? All the best to you. I hope things work out for you the way you are hoping.

gojotv! wrote: I only had about 600 shares in late March.
Now do you understand?
If you're too presumptuous, you can't see the true picture.

cactuseskimo wrote:

"I know I didn't get it wrong, since I bought twice on the way down, bolstering, and then nearly doubling my position. I'm smiling today, I can tell you."

Dude, where do you come up with these nuggets of gold? So, you poured more money into a stock in complete free fall (not once, but twice) on the way down, putting yourself further in the red, and are bragging about doubling your position, and saying you didn't get it wrong? How do you come up with this stuff???

You do realize that if you had of been one of the "right" ones and sold your shares after the CC, you could have doubled your position without even putting one further dime of your own money into the stock?

I'm just at a loss for words on how your brain works man.
 

cactuseskimo wrote:

 

"The whole market did not get this story wrong... Only those who sold.

They were very wrong."

I'm not sure if you can do basic math, because this statement couldn't be more fundamentally or mathematically wrong. ANYONE who sold during the fall after the CC was not "very wrong". They weren't even a "little wrong". They weren't even a "teesny weensy bit wrong". They were 100%, absolutely frackin' right. They sold their shares at higher prices, anticipating a drop (which they were 100% right), and if they now want to (and I'm sure many have), they could now get back in at substantially lower prices, thus dramatically increasing their overall position. That is 100% right, and for you to try and say they are wrong is absolutely pea-brained.

Maybe SZLS is headed back up, and after multiple days of you predicting big price increases and being wrong, you finally did get a little one today. Celebrating a share price of 79 cents though (when it was literally TWICE that just days ago), and rubbing it in the faces of those who were smart (and did I mention "right") and sold their position at higher prices, is one of the most nincompoop things I've heard on these boards in a long time - and that's saying a lot.

So, please tell me again how those who sold their shares at 1.50, 1.40, 1.20 etc. were "wrong", but you sitting with your shares at 79 cents are "right"? Really, I want to see how you can defy basic mathematics. Thanks in advance.

gojotv! wrote: The whole market did not get this story wrong... Only those who sold.
They were very wrong.
As evidenced by their stated reasons for selling, which were either mistaken or ridiculous.
Notions such as; "we're not approaching employers anymore" when in fact, our new telehealth support was instituted precisely to entice employers.
Ridiculous ideas like "there's no science to support Aristotle's effectiveness" which were repeatedly proven to be untrue.
Brazen lies, like "TD and CIBC have set the share price at $0.40" meant to seed a panic in the marketplace, and which are pure, actionable fraud. Screenshot those posts, people, you have a case.
I know I didn't get it wrong, since I bought twice on the way down, bolstering, and then nearly doubling my position. I'm smiling today, I can tell you.

As for management's "allusions"... puh-lease!
You don't know what they "alluded". You know that any so-called partner is going to want a disproportionately high toll, robbing shareholders of Aristotle's value. You know how the sharks eat the little fish in this market.
This strategy is so much smarter.
Get in there, show growth, and then, if we still need help, the big boys will relent, because we'll have something provable to bargain with.
It's the British Fleet of small, deft, ships against the Spanish Armada strategy. Classic. Because it works.
By the time we've insinuated ourselves everywhere in the market, they'll come back to the table, and a lot more docile.
Way to keep shareholder value where it belongs - with early adopters! It'll take a little longer to get the big revenues this way, but then, they won't be diluted out all over.
I like where this is going, and so should you.
Especially at these low, low prices!
GLTA!

Eagles1968 wrote: Is okay to be a bull on the story. That's great someone bought the warrants but how can you argue with the drop from 1.57 to 70c. The whole market got this story wrong? I am hopeful for a rebound but do you think the path the company has chosen will be the best outcome? Do you not think management alluded to a much bigger agreement all along? Try and keep emotion out of your reply please!