RE:RE:RE:So many manipulators hereNnwwzz wrote: I agree but that's not what's happening with the majority of those talking the loudest. Sayings like "there's no catalyst to bring this back" or "they have nothing at all" or that "there's 200-150 million warrants out' (the number fluctuates and it took a month and a half to bring this talking point to the next logical question of 'how many of those are in the money,' as if repeating a point without advancing it is somehow useful); these things add no value without proper scope and evidence. For example: saying 'they have no revenue' while ignoring private placements as sources of revenue, or that 'they have no deals', ignoring when they mention a purchase order of 2m from daymak, is deceptive. So is saying 'it's going to $$s in a month!' except somehow only the last one is bad? Please. Bear or bull, I don't mind. Just wish people learned how to actually construct an argument or understood what it means to be able to something 'is' or 'is not.' that's not too much to ask for, is it?
Does Nnwwzz do anything but bittch.