RE:RE:Serious question.Brian78 wrote: RoyallyScrewed wrote: This isn a quote from Edgewater's website page on licensing MCSR.
"At Edgewater Wireless, we’ve taken a revolutionary approach to Wi-Fi. With our patented Wi-Fi Spectrum Slicing technique, we enable multiple, concurrent channels of transmit and receive within the same coverage area. Proven and deployed in both the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands, Edgewater’s Wi-Fi Spectrum Slicing approach delivers the next generation of Wi-Fi today.
Licensing our technology is an excellent way for silicon companies to expand the capabilities of their Wi-Fi radios beyond WiFi6 (802.11ax), and use the Wi-Fi spectrum in ways not yet imagined. Edgewater Wireless technology has already made history by being involved in some of the most advanced Wi-Fi development currently being attempted on the globe, including Dual-Channel WiFi™, Broadcast WiFi, and seamless 5G Handoff Authentication (UnAuth). Wi-Fi Spectrum Slicing is already being embraced by the leaders in Wi-Fi application development.
Please contact us, if you would like to include the next revolution in Wi-Fi in the next spin of your silicon."
With the above claims in writing, and advertised for many years in many publications and through many, many news releases, why hasnn't a very large silicon manufacturer licensed this tech years ago and become the worlds first silicon manufacturer to adopt "the most advanced Wi-Fi development currently being attempted on the globe"that has been "proven and deployed"? (man shrugging emoji)
https://edgewaterwireless.com/solutions/wifi3-licensing/
What say you Brian78? (serious face emoji)
good questions. Maybe we will find out in the not to distant future. If a person holds zero shares I guess they won't potentially be able to sell at a profit.
Conversely, if a person doesn't hold any shares, then they wont potentially lose their investment. There are many, many other possibilities as well.
Let's say that there is a guy who has been trying to sell his house for 10 years. As you know it's been a very hot housing market for years and he still hasn't been able to sell it even though he claims it's the best house in the world, ever. Other wealthy potential real estate buyers have seen the house for years and years and are still passing on it (no offers on record). You yourself can't actually see the house and take a tour. Someone wants to sell you their tiny share in the house for $10,000 without any questions as to why the house hasn't sold being answered? They don't know either anyway. How about $1000? There's nothing in writing and no guarantee to will ever get your money back of course buy you can sell your share to someone else if they want it.
Why would you take a risk on that house and not another house? Just looking for a believable answer. (serious face emoji)