RE:RE:RE:RE:Why the negative spinveryfishy wrote: To prove a libel, statements have to be untrue. All the facts and statements made are directly from press releases of RECO and ROE ad SEDAR FILINGS. Everything that has been done by RECO/ROE is legal. But it is also unethical. RECO even has a Chief Compliance Officer whose background is top tier, and the Chairman of Board of RECO is a Queen's Counsel.
Both they cannot maintain support of the merger and keep their gold plated reputations, unless they resign. the whole RECO board needs to resign and without delay. I expect that soon.
Then man up and report to the proper authorities instead of being an anonymous little b!tch on a sub-par bullboard spewing your trash. You calling their activities illegal and unethical, so put your reputation where your mouth is and report what you claim is oh-so-wrong about these characters. Until then you are just a bashing piece of sh!t looking to weasel cheap shares out of retail investors by instilling fear about a company. you are the one that should be looked at by the authorities and your unethical actions here.