RE:RE:RE:Tertiary objectives.It seems possible that either 13 or 14 or 15 was the patient who died as this patient showed negative urine cytology eliminating sign of cancer at 30 days, but unfortunately did not live long enough to get to 3 months exam. Just guessing here, as we only now learned of this outcome.
If this was the case it would have been 3 on 3. Just a guess.
enriquesuave wrote: I wonder when will the partial responders be ruled out as either CR or not. So far even at 6 months they are showing a negative cystoscope ( no visible cancer) but a positive urine cytology. They have to use a uretoscope to examen for possible UTUC. This is a very good sign that they are still showing no cancer with cystoscope after 6 months. Numbers can go up dramatically if they are also deemed CR. IMO. The numbers are showing the minimum possible CR rates which can only go up if those pending or partial responders become CR. Add to that the second treatment which can possibly increase CR rates at 9 months and beyond.