Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Skeena Resources Ltd T.SKE

Alternate Symbol(s):  SKE

Skeena Resources Limited is a precious metals developer that is focused on advancing the Eskay Creek Gold-Silver Project, a past producing mine located in the Golden Triangle in British Columbia, Canada. Eskay Creek represents one of the highest-grade and lowest cost open-pit precious metals mines in the world, with substantial silver by-product production. It also owns the past-producing Snip gold mine (Snip). In addition to Eskay Creek and Snip, the Company also owns several exploration stage mineral properties in the Golden Triangle and Liard Mining Division of British Columbia. Its 100%-owned Eskay Creek Project is a high-grade volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposit. The Snip mine consists of one mining lease and eight mineral claims totaling approximately 4,546 hectares (ha) in the Liard Mining Division. It has staked a 74,633-ha Hoodoo Project, located approximately 65 kilometers northwest of Eskay Creek. It also has interests in KSP property.


TSX:SKE - Post by User

Comment by templetooth2on May 12, 2021 7:01pm
210 Views
Post# 33188508

RE:RE:Curiouser

RE:RE:Curiouser
I guess it's always a game simulation / trade-off decision at this point of a project's development: will the extra 16 or 19 million shares of dilution meaningfully cut into the expected final pay-off in a takeover? Would an acquirer's heart flutter at the thought of a complete camp?

On the other hand, I guess it could be said that it demonstrates the ability of the company to push ahead with development on its own, thereby "forcing" the hand of an acquirer who might prefer to see the project on a back burner for the next few years, for whatever reasons.

Personally, I just hate to see an ever-growing share count. But I guess that's par for the course for a developer. Anyway, I appreciate the response and will keep my fingers crossed.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>