RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:#uraniumWhen Ross was asked the CGN question the very first thing he did was to readjust how he was sitting. His involuntary reaction indicates to me that the CGN subject matter is possibly a sensitive one for him. There is also a possibility that Ross has been coached as to how to deal with any CGN questions and his readjustment in his seat was a sort of preparing to go into battle with respect to the question. Ross put the emphasis on stating more than once that CGN is a supporter of the project but he did not say that CGN is a supporter of FCU. Taking note of details like this is important and in the past I correctly called out a company for statements they made with regard to how they were being supported and not being supported in a somewhat similar situation to what I think FCU is facing. In the other company's situation their parent company name had the same first part as their subsidiary company's name that was in the contracts and when asked questions they only used the first name which was a critical lack of detail with respect to the questions being asked. My suspicions with regard to how they were answering questions and how they were being supported and not supported ultimately proved correct and they were originally denying what I was suspecting. At the end of the day at this point in time CGN is not stepping up to support FCU in advancing this project financially beyond the initial CGN investment in FCU and this appears not to be a good situation for FCU.