RE:RE:RE:Sept 11th 2020Good point, but what is the level that satisfies the world that there is sufficient supply? 20,000 may sound like a low number globally as well. Sounds like it didn't help with marketing....for the product....helped with marketing for the stock though, unfortunately.
yearninyank wrote: Of course if you are going to tell the world you invented a highly complex and effective device they can mount on the wall to detect the virus you must also reassure that you have the capacity to make a whole mess of them quickly. Remeber the ventilator shortage "cisis". And in Canada anyway, who was there to help...? And so Danby on board is significant. I always wondered how the world would react after it accepted it wanted and needed virus detectors and then came up short. Sometimes I tell myself that forsight and sensitivity to this possibility drives much of the otherwise insane seeming strategy that Ghezzi has been pursuing (and which has led us to this share price that I'm not ok with!).