RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:NEWS
if it was purely speculative than why wasnt it done? The tech by the way was developed when the Brothers were still there under their leadership so speculative or not they are by rights co owners of the tech regardless of how shareholders feel. Now how on earth will this be $1 to $2 if peoples' beef is that the company has nothing out and will keep punishing the share value because of it? It really honestly doesnt matter the plus shares or negative shares at this point given that the grievance has to do with 0 product and commercial revenue but where plus shares become problematic is that when there is revenue and calculating the value those extra shares are dilutive again as when the raises happened but because sentiments were still higher and optimistic of commercial revenue we never felt the pain as we are now. That said with plus shares and if people stopped having such negative sentiments and see that yes this time it happens we sure in hell wouldnt be sitting at this price but instead closer to $2 however it is what it is and we get what we do until all of this stupidity of carrying the past to the present is fully put to rest. It is but a matter of time that happens.