RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Supply agreements are legally binding!This is likely aimed at the speciality market where performance is very important. I suggest you look at where other graphene companies price their product at, gmg for example is pricing their product at $1000/kg... So the only game in town is NanoXplore. Another point is that it could possibly help cement producers lower their CO2 level. You are downplaying the importance of the agreement. Gerdau recently signed with first graphene to provide their graphene product to the same market... The big difference is that it was a non binding MoU compare to NanoXplores legally binding supply and distribution agreement. It tells you where Gerdau is actually committed!