GREY:ATBPF - Post by User
Comment by
Pandoraon Jun 30, 2021 2:19am
181 Views
Post# 33471671
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Changeyoubet
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Changeyoubet 123ABC wrote: MrMugsy wrote: Forestview wrote: Interesting perspective Mugs, but I think this is where everyone is frustrated. All we heard was P3 delay to Q1 2022. If there are strategic reasons then we should be provided with some transparency. I've emailed Dan ---- haven't heard back (not sure I will), but it's frustrating that we have to email him to get these insights.
MrMugsy wrote: GameChangerBet wrote: For someone who put me on ignore you sure do mention me a lot.
RE:Bye
YukonJezza wrote:
you are my first stockhouse Ignore
I'm honoured.
Perhaps provide something of substance that we can all share and discuss.
YukonJezza wrote:
changeyouBet, you must be angry , Or your conversations with Dan did not happen and you BS'ed us all.
Well said Gamechanger.
Here's a thought to consider ...
We know why they're working with academia and it seems it's that kind of work that is getting passed along to CRO for further development. Using outside resources because we're too small.
We know why we're looking to update old patents - all about value in negotiations.
What we don't know is ... why are we doing single-dose IND-opening studies and if AME depends on that study before the AME can begin. Why would this matter ?
If I'm looking to buy OTENA and run with that product through Phase 3, maybe I'm requesting these things to be done in advance of a hand-off. I want a better target for pass/fail so that I have more confidence in a speedier P3 ... before I buy this drug. If that were true - it would be easier to understand why Single Dose and AME are getting in the way. It would also be an area that ATE couldn't get into any detailed explanations if negotiations are in a confidential period.
Just something to think about.
Hopefully we can discuss here and the haters can play on the Island of Ignore. : )
Right Forest - and I'm sure you will get a response ... sooner if he can ... later if he can't.
Will be interesting to see what he says to you.
Hey Dan, sorry I mean Mugsy, best get off stockhouse and hop to that email then?
Maybe ask him if he is like the rest of us and getting older every day. It would be nice to see success while we are still on the right side of the grass. That does not apply to you younger types I know but some of us wonder. That's why I got out of GUD -- Goodman was right up front saying GUD is for your grandkids not for you. If you look at a 5 or 10 year chart you can agree with him.
I was hoping ATE would be better! I haven't heard such a claim out of Dan.