Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Theratechnologies Inc T.TH

Alternate Symbol(s):  THTX

Theratechnologies Inc. is a Canada-based clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company. The Company is focused on the development and commercialization of therapies addressing unmet medical needs. It markets prescription products for people with human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) in the United States. The Company's research pipeline focuses on specialized therapies addressing unmet medical needs in HIV, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and oncology. Its medicines include Trogarzo and EGRIFTA SV (tesamorelin for injection). Trogarzo (ibalizumab-uiyk) injection is a long-acting monoclonal antibody which binds to domain 2 of the CD4 T cell receptors. EGRIFTA SV (tesamorelin for injection) is approved in the United States for the reduction of excess abdominal fat in people with HIV who have lipodystrophy. Its portfolio includes Phase I clinical trial of sudocetaxel zendusortide (TH1902), a novel peptide-drug conjugate (PDC), in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.


TSX:TH - Post by User

Comment by Wino115on Jul 02, 2021 9:34pm
141 Views
Post# 33488901

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Fitting

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Fitting

yes, the low volume is still an overall negative from an investor viewpoint.  On the other hand, seeing a rising price on still low volume is indicative of someone building a position, so perhaps we have seen the last of the OO retail puke.  This earnings report may be the test if the analysts downgrade earnings, which they should.  They probably won't change targets, but reset revenues and earnings.  


scarlet1967 wrote:

"As for MTD at any dose  level if grade 3 toxicity is shown the MTD will be the previous lower dose"
Again I have to correct myself, if grade 3 toxicity is observed during single patient dosing then that would be the DLT for that dose NOT MTD then they move to 3+3 with a lower dose.
I think it's a lot of discussion round dose escalation and science lately which is great but no one has addressed the low volume. The LSA webinar didn't do the magic many had expected, no LSA reports either so now either we don't have a decent volume or when we get it a good portion is short sellers. The low volume is a major obstacle for any serious investor who wants  to take a position without significantly increasing  the SP. The company has to understand not all investors are willing to wait medium to long term (years) some are happy to take a position for few months only and move on and it is good to have them as well because they increase the demand, volume and activity so other more long term investors can take a position. The strategy to inform market about big milestones is not helpful better strategy imo is feeding the market with little small progresses. It feels like the turn the fire on periodically and then nothing, no follow ups, next round around  they have to start from scratch and turn it on rather than keep it burning. Point is LSA alone doesn't cut it as we now evidently have seen the same problems post webinar, low volume, stagnant valuation, little awareness etc. The company needs a lot more proactive marketing efforts on a continuing basis imo.


 


 

scarlet1967 wrote:

 

The DLT is at grade 3 or above, the toxicity is graded from grade 1 to 5.

Apart from 5( lethal consequences) all other grades are reversible hence the higher grades the more need of intervention, treatment and longer recovery. At the end of each cycle patients  are reviewed for safety data so one can presume if there are any toxicity it will be detected  there and then.

The below is a repeat of what quartly posted earlier.

As for MTD at any dose  level if grade 3 toxicity is shown the MTD will be the previous lower dose. At any level

if 2 or more patients of a group of 3 show DLT the MTD will be the previous lower dose, if 2 or more patients of a group of 6 show DLT again the MTD will be the previous lower dose.

 

In May this year FDA initiated project Optimus, they try to move away from MTD as a working dose for trials due to adverse effects from high dosage.

To me the company needs to find an effective and safe dose as a working dosage going into phase 2 and beyond so although no DLT or DLT at whatever level as long as they have a good therapeutic window they might set a cut off target to make sure no one throughout the trial shows grade 3 or above toxicity.

The fact that as mentioned earlier the part1 phase 1 can take longer into fall has nothing to do with company trying to keep dosing patients with higher dosages but as many mentioned the process can take longer as there could be some back and forth in dosing depending on whether they see DLT during process.

 

This is the grading chart.

Adverse-Effects

Traditional 3+3 after the DLT is observed in first two or more cycles.
 

“1. Traditional 3+3 Design The traditional 3+3 dose-escalation design starts off by treating three patients at a conservative low dose. If no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) are observed, the trial proceeds to the next higher dose with three new patients. If one DLT is observed among the previous three patients, three more patients are treated at this dose. If no DLTs are seen among these three patients, the study moves on to the next dose. If two or more DLTs are found among the six patients, then the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is defined as the previous dose. Likewise, if two or three out of three patients experience DLTs at any level, the previous dose becomes the MTD. This continues until an MTD is defined.”


 

qwerty22 wrote:

 

All sorts of grade 3 and beyond toxicities. Just bare in mind this is a very technical, defined process designed just to find a working dose. It's not really defining the full safety profile of the drug, that comes later, although I guess it's a pointer to that. I read this 3+3 MTD process typically leads to a situation where the drug gives grade 3+ events in 40-70% of patients in the clinic. As Scarlett discovered there is concern at the FDA this method is leading to too toxic drug doses.

 

palinc2000 wrote: At what point do they determine that MTD has been reached,,,How is toxicity defined? Is there a time factor involved,,,?Can toxicity be reversed after a a few days .....?  

 

 


 




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>