RE:RE:RE:RE:India rocks... here's why...overroad wrote: canyousayiii wrote: I guess that I own more shares than you do and that is the reason why I think about what I read and see. There is no chance that you would be happy with the losses you incurred had you made a significant investment. You have no clue what you are talking about. The HC results are not going to be binary, that it detects Covid or it doesn't. If it was, and if it contradicted the "independent lab" results that KNR touted, Ghezzi and his experts would have an even bigger problem on their hands. Yup, you got it, as per my last post, cartridge replacement cost in a hospital in a country that is struggling to curtail Covid is high, even more when you consider how much a $ is worth locally. They detected Covid and they don't even know which individual(s) triggered it, and will have to replace the cartridge regardless. If this thing works, whether you have a breathalyser or not, it should go off for every infected individual anyhow. But I do not expect you to actually think about the flawed logic you are using.
wilander wrote: Yup candypants is officially irrelevant. Not a chance he owns shares. This is 100% great news. The chance of HC not giving it the thumbs up gets less and less. And like you said, maybe they are looking to see if it can even more than we think and will be a medical device. (The only flaw with the breathalyzer idea for me is the cartridge replacement cost in a high traffic area.)
you must have missed it last fall when paul talked of potentiay opening the indian market and how they wouls need to find manufacturers in india to satisfy their laws regarding products being sold there. so we have literally no idea whether the cartridges are manufaxtured locally to meet thay standard in which case the chemicals and supplies would be exponentially cheaper. also, in regards to
.....accidently hit post......to continue, in regards to the thought that them putting a device in a high traffic area might not be smart as its hard to pinpoint people who could have potentially set it off, that becomes easier with a check in, or qr code scanner. they can pull it up and see everyone who walked in x amount of minutes before the reading . but i do not not expect you to actually think about the flawed logic you are using